The requirements to this could be that the title you want to split is a merged or incorporated title and/or has to be 'big enough'. Vice versa you are perhaps able to split some titles up. destroy one (no 'cost' but heavy opinion malus)ģ. So if you are the king of castile, leon, navarra, and asturia and you whant to hold the title of king of aragon or andalusia without penalty you have three posibilities:ġ.

And thus i would limit titles of the same tier to, let's say, the number of four. You have to trigger this by decision and keep this 'status quo' let's say for 50 years to become permanent. In the case of castile i would allow merge kingdom of castile with the kingdom of leon thus merging the CoA too. I would like to be able to merge or attach titles to each other, so no following succsessor could easily tear apart. To a constant CoA swap to any given claim i would disagree.īut i would even go further. So the english King could, permanently decide to thighten the bond between the english and the frensh crown. Every decade your realm is known under a different CoA? Or is the wish that you can decide on your own so it is less a issue for a new mechanic but a new kind of decision. So, as far as i understand it the wish is to change the CoA of your main title every time you got an equal titles claim? So what if you have more then one claim at once? what if your claims change fast. Changing lesser titles does not make sense to me either. The Dinastic CoA are adressed by the new feature of the cadet branches.

Your Dinastic CoA, your Realm CoA (aka main title) and all the Other CoA of your 'lesser' titles. So you have three CoA witch are relateed to your person. And here the question is: where to start and where to stop? If i can freely use this 'feature' it leads inevitably to a CoA-gore. But as i understand the thread opener he want to change dinasty/personal CoA corresponding to the titles he simply bears. In this case it makes sense to merge the CoA too. If you merge them you also destroy one title. In CK2 they stay two titles so you can conquer one of them. So the above example is the CoA of the historically merged Crown of Castille and Leon. As long as you can't merge titles it doesn't make any sense in merging CoA. But titles are more like bricks you can 'collect'. In fact it doesn't really matter here anyway i think.Ĭause: what is exactly the point of the thread? inGame you bear the CoA of your DINASTY (and with cadet branches in CK3 changes will come anyways). In later times of heraldic decay i could agree in some way. In the golden age of heraldry (the timeframe of CK2 vanilla) i would strongly disagree.

Ck2 cool custom coat of arms